- Rolleiflex 2.8 comparison serial#
- Rolleiflex 2.8 comparison license#
- Rolleiflex 2.8 comparison series#
It is admittedly one of the best 135 mm lens ever produced. based their findings on what they noted as the most reliable fact and yet came, in some instances, with different namings / conclusions. evans all did their immaculate research in the old Franke - Heidecke and Rollei archives.
Rolleiflex 2.8 comparison serial#
The lens produces a very beautiful images and is the best and most popular 135 mm lens for Rollei cameras. There are several sources for Rollei TLR camera serial numbers.
Rolleiflex 2.8 comparison license#
The exact replica of the lens - Rollei-HFT Planar 135 mm f/2.8 - was manufactured in considerably greater amounts under the license agreement at Rollei works in Germany and Singapore, but it has a real HFT coating. The lens was manufactured in limited quantities at Carl Zeiss works in Oberkochen, Germany.
Rolleiflex 2.8 comparison series#
However, by this point, competition was fierce with other manufacturers producing TLRs that paled in comparison to the Rollei series but were much cheaper. The Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/2.8 HFT is a fast telephoto prime lens for 35 mm SLR Rollei S元5 cameras.Īccording to the manufacturer, these lenses feature a proprietary T* coating, but are marked as HFT (co-designed by Carl Zeiss and Rollei) due to marketing consideration. Eventually they expanded their product range to create the Rolleicord, a modest version of the Rolleiflex which was aimed at amateurs who demanded lower prices. My understanding is that later models, such as the F’s, have the same system.
This fast lens was widely advertised in the marketing of the camera and puts it on par optically with the Rolleiflex f/2.8, yet for a fraction of the price. Here are a few comparisons of the photos I took between the f/3.5 and the f/2.8.User reviews (0) Photos (0) Tests (0) Owners (1) Views (8753) Average price: $380 I have a Rolleiflex TLR 2.8 E2 which has a focusing screen holder that can be released and raised so that the screens can slide in and out of retaining guides on the sides and top. Its taking lens is fast at f/2.8, and it’s got a three element Toko 60mm f/2.8 viewing lens. I’d likely shoot it year round if most of my vintage cameras didn’t cap out at 1/500 shutter speed.Įpilogue:I absolutely NEED to buy myself a Rolleiflex 2.8. I love the grains, fine like sand, pronounced yet not distracting (like grain can be with outdated or pushed/pulled film). That one stop from f3.5 to f2.8 made all the difference to my hand holding! The Ilford Delta has always been one of my favourite films to shoot. Rolleiflex 2.8f on Kodak TriX 400 Thick Morning Fog ASMR Rolleiflex 2.8F vs Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS Review Fix Old Cameras: Hasselblad 80mm T-Star Shutter. comparing the new 5 element Xenotar on the Rolleiflex 3.5E compared to older. Vancouver – Nicole: I got the roll back and it looks great. The camera that featured this lens is known as the Rolleiflex 2.8 A model. I made the grave error of only packing one roll of film that night and saw photos virtually everywhere, it was a rare dry warm February night. (As I’ve mentioned many times before…) I have a good friend who doesn’t mind loaning me cameras, so I borrowed his illustrious Rolleiflex 2.8! And with that I was able to shoot my entrance ways at f2.8 at 1/60. Once developed the pictures were as expected – slightly blurry, obviously not quite what I wanted.
My light meter was saying I needed one more stop, but regardless I shot f3.5 at 1/60. However, the widest aperture on that camera is f3.5, the slowest shutter speed I was willing to go was 1/60 (I’m hand-holding). This is an in depth review covering the technical and visual specifications on bot. Vancouver – Nicole: previously I had taken my Rolleicord Vb out with Ilford Delta 3200 and used it to take photos of building entrance ways at night. In this video, I'm comparing the Rolleiflex 2.8F vs Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS.
0 kommentar(er)
